Mouse preoptic area — pooled dnFGFR genotype effect (bulk RNA-seq)
Mus musculus · Preoptic area · bulk RNA-seq
Selected data and study scope
This dataset contains bulk RNA-seq data from Mus musculus, sampled from preoptic area. The default comparison examines gene expression in dnFGFR relative to Control.
This analysis estimates the dominant-negative FGFR genotype effect across same-sex and opposite-sex housing. The authors instead compare housing conditions within each genotype.
The explorer includes 1 track and 1 comparison for this dataset.
The default track, Preoptic area (POA), includes 10 Control samples and 10 dnFGFR samples in this comparison. These are analysis sample counts. Check the source for biological replication and pooling.
Interpretation and limitations
The pooled genotype contrast is exploratory and answers a different question from the source publication's within-genotype housing contrasts.
The measurement combines expression from the cells in the tissue sample. A difference in tissue expression alone does not identify which cell type contributes to it.
Expression values are CPM (TMM-normalized): counts per million on library sizes adjusted by the TMM factors of the study’s own edgeR fit. This scale adjusts for library size and composition, not gene length. Use it to inspect a feature across the samples in this analysis. CPM values are not absolute transcript counts.
Evidence and verification
Pipeline QC passed. Mouse preoptic area — pooled dnFGFR genotype effect (bulk RNA-seq); all 1 registered contrasts on default track poa
Experimental design review needed. Mouse preoptic area — pooled dnFGFR genotype effect (bulk RNA-seq); all 1 registered contrasts on default track poa
Author concordance not assessed. Author effect concordance has not been assessed
Pipeline QC can pass while experimental-design limitations remain. Read both assessments before interpreting results.
Open the dataset in the Explorer to read each check and its evidence. Author concordance compares effects for matched genes. It does not require identical author P values or FDR.
Read the analysis methods and interpretation guide and how to cite the source study and HypoExplorer. The source publication may include tissues, groups or comparisons beyond the data shown here.
Source study
Exploratory dominant-negative FGFR versus control effect pooled across same- and opposite-sex housing; authors test housing within genotype (GSE285006)
Source publication
Akonom TN, Allen MA, Tsai PS
Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
Repository study title
Gene Expression Patterns in the Preoptic Area of Mice with Defective FGF Signaling in GnRH Neurons
The original study authors produced these data. HypoExplorer displays selected data and analyses that may cover only part of the study.
Comparisons in HypoExplorer
dnFGFR vs Control · default
Positive differential-expression values indicate higher expression in the case group relative to the baseline. Check the comparison direction and study design when interpreting results.
Available tracks
| Track | Features | Control n | dnFGFR n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoptic area (POA) | 16,923 | 10 | 10 |
Expression and analysis results
Open this dataset to inspect gene expression and differential-expression results across the available tracks. Pathway enrichment is also available. The pathway databases differ by dataset.
HypoExplorer is in beta testing. Features and analyses may change during testing. Review the original source, analysis methods and quality-control checks before using a result in research.